C. Bonnett, M. A. Troxel, W. Hartley, A. Amara, B. Leistedt, M. R. Becker, G. M. Bernstein, S. L. Bridle, C. Bruderer, M. T. Busha, M. Carrasco Kind, M. J. Childress, F. J. Castander, C. Chang, M. Crocce, T. M. Davis, T. F. Eifler, J. Frieman, E. Gaztanaga, D. Gruen, T. Kacprzak, J. Kwan, O. Lahav, G. Lewis, C. Lidman, H. Lin, N. MacCrann, R. Miquel, C. R. O’Neill, A. Palmese, H.V. Peiris, A. Refregier, E. Rozo, E. S. Rykoff, I. Sadeh, C. Sanchez, S. Uddin, R. H. Wechsler, J. Zuntz, and The DES Collaboration
Key figures from the paper:
The i-band magnitude distribution of the matched spectroscopic and weak lensing catalogues
The redshift distribution of the validation sample from spectroscopy compared to the 4 photoz codes and COSMOS photozs
The redshift distribution in each of the 3 tomographic redshift bins for different samples (3 different spectroscopic samples - upper 3 rows) and on the DES data itself (bottom row)
The predicted impact of photometric redshift estimation differences on the cosmic shear two-point function and cosmology